Reference | 75HCW6UW (94) (Excluded)

Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat.


Stuart, J. C.; Munckhof, T.; Voets, G.; Scharringa, J.; Fluit, A.; Leverstein-van Hall, M. (No Location)

None (2012)

Reference


The aims of this study were to compare the prevalence and load of ESBL positive isolates between organic and conventional retail chicken meat samples, and to compare the distribution of ESBL genes, strain genotypes and degree of co-resistance

In 2010, 98 raw chicken breasts were collected from 12 stores in Utrecht, a city in the centre of the Netherlands. Eighty percent of the meat samples were collected from 9 stores from 5 supermarket chains with a combined Dutch market share of approximately 90%, and 20% of the meat samples were collected from organic butcheries.

AST Method: Broth Microdilution

Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: None

Reference reports using a MIC table: None

Is Excluded: True

Country Sub-Region Sub-Region Detail
ID Note Resolution

Factors


Title Host Host Production Stage Description ROs