Reference | Perrin.Guyomard2020 (40000)

Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter.


Perrin-Guyomard, A. and Jouy, E. and Urban, D. and Chauvin, C. and Granier, S. A. and Mour and , G. and Chevance, A. and Adam, C. and Moulin, G. and Kempf, I. (France)

None (2020)

Reference


Data related to the use of quinolones and fluoroquinolones were obtained from the report Sales Survey of Veterinary Medicinal Products Containing Antimicrobials in France – 2018 drafted by the French Agency for Veterinary Medicinal Products (ANMV) (AnsesANMV, 2019). Briefly, each year since 1999, the ANMV publishes data based on annual reporting of antimicrobial sales by the pharmaceutical companies marketing them. The data cover 100 % of authorised drugs in France. Data concerning fluoroquinolone susceptibility of C. jejuni in broilers and turkeys were obtained in the framework of European monitoring based on the EFSA report (EFSA, 2007), and on EU Commission Decision 2013/652/EU implementing Directive 2003/99/EC (European Commission, 2013).

Briefly, every year from 2010 to 2013 (broilers only), then every two years from 2014 to 2018 (broilers and turkeys), caecal samples were collected at the slaughterhouse according to a random sampling scheme representative of national production. A maximum of one C. jejuni isolate per broiler flock was included to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) by the micro-dilution method according to the EFSA recommended antimicrobial panel and concentration ranges. Percentages of non-wild type isolates were assessed using epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values, i.e. 0.5 mg/L for ciprofloxacin for C. jejuni. A similar scheme was implemented for indicator E. coli collected from the caecal samples of broilers, turkeys and pigs (EFSA, 2008). The ECOFF values of nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin for E. coli are 16 mg/L and 0.06 mg/L, respectively. Moreover, for comparison with results obtained for strains from diseased animals, the percentages of isolates with a ciprofloxacin MIC higher than the clinical breakpoint (i.e. > 1 mg/L) were calculated. These strains are designated here as “high-level resistant”. Data from the RESAPATH network were used for E. coli from diseased poultry and pigs (Boireau et al., 2018). This network collects, on a voluntary basis, the results obtained by French veterinary laboratories performing antimicrobial susceptibility tests requested by veterinarians on bacteria isolated in a pathological context. Susceptibility tests must be performed using the disk diffusion method (French standard NF U47- 107) according to the veterinary section of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society of Microbiology (CA-SFM) (https://www.sfmmicrobiologie.org/presentation-de-la-sfm/sections-et-groupes-detravail/comite-de-lantibiogramme/).

AST Method: Multiple Methods

Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: True

Reference reports using a MIC table: False

Is Excluded: False

Country Sub-Region Sub-Region Detail
France None Nationwide
ID Note Resolution

Factors


Title Host Host Production Stage Description ROs
AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Turkey Not Specified Farm Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). High level resistance (> 1 ug/mL: clinical breakpoint). Caecal sample @ abatt 1
AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Turkey Not Specified Farm Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 6
AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Turkey Not Specified Farm Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). High level resistance (> 1 ug/mL 1
AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Turkey Not Specified Farm Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 6