Reference | Price2007 (20016)

The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production.


Price, Lance B.; Lackey, Leila G.; Vailes, Rocio; Silbergeld, Ellen (United States of America)

Environmental Health Perspectives (2007)

Reference


producers. We included products from five different poultry producers in the present study: A) Bell & Evans (Fredericksburg, PA); B) Murray's (South Fallsburg, NY); C) Eberly (Stevens, PA); D) Perdue (Salisbury, MD); and E) Tyson (Springdale, AR). Producers A-C claim that their chickens are raised without any antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones. We refer to these producers and their products as antibiotic-free. Producers D and E do not claim general prohibitions on antibiotics; we refer to these producers and their products as conventional. A critical caveat to this desig- nation is that each of the conventional produc- ers announced separately in February 2002 that they had adopted company policies pro- hibiting the use of fluoroquinolones. In the same announcement, producer D claimed that no fluoroquinolones had been used in the year before the announcement. Finally, all produc- ers except producer C claimed to exclusively slaughter their own flocks in their processing plants. Representatives from producer C acknowledged that custom flocks, including those treated with antibiotics, were occasion- ally processed in their facilities during the study period.

We purchased fresh chicken products from grocery stores in the Baltimore, Maryland, area on a weekly basis from 19 January 2004 to 7 June 2004 and from 20 February 2006 to 5 June 2006. Two to three packages from each of the five producers were purchased each time (except when availability was limited). Thighs and legs (bone-in and skin-on) were the default cuts for the study. However, these cuts were not consistently available for all producers; in those cases, we tested alternative cuts, includ- ing breasts, quarters, and whole chickens. Packages were refrigerated at 40C until they were sampled (within 48 hr of purchase). A single piece of chicken was sampled from each package as follows. First, each package was wiped with 70% ethanol and cut open with a new disposable razor blade; the plastic cover was then removed and photocopied for our records. We used sterile forceps to transfer the entire piece of chicken to a stomacher bag containing 200 mL sterile Bolton broth supplemented with laked horse blood (Quad Five, Ryegate, MT); samples were shaken by hand for 2 min, the chicken was removed using forceps, and the bag was sealed 1-2 cm above the top of the broth. Enrichments were incubated at 42C for 22-26 hr (Hunt 2000; Price et al. 2005).

AST Method: None

Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: True

Reference reports using a MIC table: False

Is Excluded: False

Country Sub-Region Sub-Region Detail
United States of America None None
ID Note Resolution

Factors


Title Host Host Production Stage Description ROs
Fluoroquinolone Usage Ban Chicken Broilers Farm Antibiotic free (ABF) farms 2004 vs ABF farms 2006, fluoroquinlone resistance 1
Fluoroquinolone Usage Ban Chicken Broilers Farm Conventional (Conv) farms 2004 vsConventional farms 2006, fluoroquinlone resistance 1
Production Type Chicken Broilers Farm 2004 or Pre-Ban: Antibiotic-free (Aggregated producers A+B+C) vs Conventional (Aggregated producers D+E), Fluoroquinolone resistant campylobacter 1
Production Type Chicken Broilers Farm 2006 or Post-Ban: Antibiotic-free (Aggregated producers A+B+C) vs Conventional (Aggregated producers D+E), Fluoroquinolone resistant campylobacter 1
Production Type Chicken Carcass Farm Post-2005 ban of fluoroquinolone use in poultry production (USA). 1
Production Type Chicken Carcass Farm Pre-2005 ban of fluoroquinolone use in poultry production (USA). 1