Hussain, Arif and Shaik, Sabiha and Ranjan, Amit and Nandanwar, Nishant and Tiwari, Sumeet K. and Majid, Mohammad and Baddam, Ramani and Qureshi, Insaf A. and Semmler, Torsten and Wieler, Lothar H. and Islam, Mohammad A. and Chakravortty, Dipshikha and Ah (India)
Frontiers in Microbiology (2017)
Between February, 2015 to September, 2015, 22 poultry retail outlets were sampled from Karnataka (n = 35), Telangana (n = 59), Andhra Pradesh (n = 15) and Maharashtra (n = 11); this resulted in a total of 120 samples. Commercial broiler chickens were conventionally raised in farms and fed with commercial feeds; free-range poultry birds were country (native) chickens that were raised in households and small backyard farms that grew by free-ranging. All cecal samples were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol and a portion (~25 g) was incised. Similarly, around 25 g of raw meat was excised from each meat sample.
A total of 75 poultry ceca, entailing broiler and free-range chicken (39 and 36, respectively) together with 45 raw meat samples, representing broiler and free-range chicken (32 and 13, respectively) were obtained from retail poultry outlets. From each shop, multiple samples (different birds) were procured.
AST Method: Disk Diffusion
Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: False
Reference reports using a MIC table: False
Is Excluded: False
| Country | Sub-Region | Sub-Region Detail |
|---|---|---|
| India | Andhra Pradesh (State) | None |
| India | Karnataka (State) | None |
| India | Telangana (State) | None |
| India | Maharashtra (State) | None |
| ID | Note | Resolution |
|---|
| Title | Host | Host | Production Stage | Description | ROs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Production type | Chicken | Broilers | Farm | Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range | 6 |
| Production type | Chicken | Broilers | Farm | Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range | 6 |