Boulianne, Martine and Arsenault, Julie and Daignault, Danielle and Archambault, Marie and Letellier, Ann and Dutil, Lucie (Canada)
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research (2016)
An observational study was conducted in chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered at federal processing plants in the province of Quebec, Canada from April 2003 to February 2004. A flock was defined as a group of birds from the same hatchery raised in a single poultry house during the same period of time. Only 1 flock per production site was selected over the study period. A systematic sampling method with a target sample size of 30 birds per flock was used for selection. The detailed method for flock and bird sampling is described in a previous study (8). A questionnaire about husbandry practices was sent to the flock manager within 2 d after slaughter (available in French on request). Producers were asked to provide the commercial names of antimicrobials administered at hatchery, the commercial names and doses (mg/kg) of anticoccidials and antimicrobials used as feed additives during each growth period, and information pertaining to the use of curative drugs. Written consent was also obtained from producers on a voluntary basis to contact hatchery and feed mill representatives in order to get and/or validate information about antimicrobial use.
Bacteria were isolated on a subsample of 51 chicken and 39 turkey flocks randomly selected for AMR testing, as described in a previous study (9). After evisceration, intestines from selected birds were placed in individual sterile plastic bags and put on ice for a maximum of 8 h. Two or 3 pools were then created for each flock, with each pool including cecal contents of approximately 10 birds. For each pool, feces were collected from 1 cecum for each bird using a sterile cotton swab, put in a sterile stomacher bag with 30 mL of nutritive broth, and homogenized with a stomacher (Lab-blender 400BA 6021; Seward Laboratory, London, England) for 30 s. All samples were subsequently frozen at 280°C for later analysis.
AST Method: Broth Microdilution
Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: True
Reference reports using a MIC table: False
Is Excluded: False
Country | Sub-Region | Sub-Region Detail |
---|---|---|
Canada | None | Quebec |
ID | Note | Resolution |
---|
Title | Host | Host | Production Stage | Description | ROs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ceftiofur Use | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Ceftiofur use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Tetracycline Use | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Tetracycline use (feed additive or treatment). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Virginiamycin Use | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Virginiamycin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Growth on used litter | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Growth on litter previously used by chickens. | 2 |
Tylosin Use | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Tylosin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Virginiamycin Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Virginiamycin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Tetracycline Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Tetracycline use (feed additive or treatment). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Gentamicin Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Gentamicin use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Bacitracin Use | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Bacitracin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Gentamicin Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Gentamicin Use at Hatchery. No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Tylosin Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Tylosin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Gentamicin Use | Turkey | Carcass | Farm | Gentamicin Use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. | 2 |
Ceftiofur Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Ceftiofur Use at Hatchery. No AMU level provided. | 1 |
Bacitracin Use | Chicken | Carcass | Farm | Bacitracin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. | 1 |