Reference | Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe (10253)

Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada.


Boulianne, Martine and Arsenault, Julie and Daignault, Danielle and Archambault, Marie and Letellier, Ann and Dutil, Lucie (Canada)

Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research (2016)

Reference


An observational study was conducted in chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered at federal processing plants in the province of Quebec, Canada from April 2003 to February 2004. A flock was defined as a group of birds from the same hatchery raised in a single poultry house during the same period of time. Only 1 flock per production site was selected over the study period. A systematic sampling method with a target sample size of 30 birds per flock was used for selection. The detailed method for flock and bird sampling is described in a previous study (8). A questionnaire about husbandry practices was sent to the flock manager within 2 d after slaughter (available in French on request). Producers were asked to provide the commercial names of antimicrobials administered at hatchery, the commercial names and doses (mg/kg) of anticoccidials and antimicrobials used as feed additives during each growth period, and information pertaining to the use of curative drugs. Written consent was also obtained from producers on a voluntary basis to contact hatchery and feed mill representatives in order to get and/or validate information about antimicrobial use.

Bacteria were isolated on a subsample of 51 chicken and 39 turkey flocks randomly selected for AMR testing, as described in a previous study (9). After evisceration, intestines from selected birds were placed in individual sterile plastic bags and put on ice for a maximum of 8 h. Two or 3 pools were then created for each flock, with each pool including cecal contents of approximately 10 birds. For each pool, feces were collected from 1 cecum for each bird using a sterile cotton swab, put in a sterile stomacher bag with 30 mL of nutritive broth, and homogenized with a stomacher (Lab-blender 400BA 6021; Seward Laboratory, London, England) for 30 s. All samples were subsequently frozen at 280°C for later analysis.

AST Method: Broth Microdilution

Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: True

Reference reports using a MIC table: False

Is Excluded: False

Country Sub-Region Sub-Region Detail
Canada None Quebec
ID Note Resolution

Factors


Title Host Host Production Stage Description ROs
Ceftiofur Use Turkey Carcass Farm Ceftiofur use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. 1
Tetracycline Use Turkey Carcass Farm Tetracycline use (feed additive or treatment). No AMU level provided. 1
Virginiamycin Use Turkey Carcass Farm Virginiamycin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. 1
Growth on used litter Turkey Carcass Farm Growth on litter previously used by chickens. 2
Tylosin Use Turkey Carcass Farm Tylosin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. 1
Virginiamycin Use Chicken Carcass Farm Virginiamycin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. 1
Tetracycline Use Chicken Carcass Farm Tetracycline use (feed additive or treatment). No AMU level provided. 1
Gentamicin Use Chicken Carcass Farm Gentamicin use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. 1
Bacitracin Use Turkey Carcass Farm Bacitracin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. 1
Gentamicin Use Chicken Carcass Farm Gentamicin Use at Hatchery. No AMU level provided. 1
Tylosin Use Chicken Carcass Farm Tylosin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. 1
Gentamicin Use Turkey Carcass Farm Gentamicin Use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. 2
Ceftiofur Use Chicken Carcass Farm Ceftiofur Use at Hatchery. No AMU level provided. 1
Bacitracin Use Chicken Carcass Farm Bacitracin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. 1