Title | Description | Host | Host Type | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antimicrobial Use | Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). | Swine | None | 6 |
Antimicrobial Use | Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). # AMR+ for Finland was shown as 0, but Table 3 also shows 14% AMR+. | Swine | None | 1 |
Antimicrobial Use | Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). | Swine | None | 7 |
Antimicrobial Use | Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Pig stage of life unknown. # AMR+ for Finland is reported as 0, but Table 3 also reports 14% AMR+. | Swine | None | 1 |
Antimicrobial Use | Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). | Swine | None | 6 |