Reference | Kim2005 (10024)

Susceptibility of Escherichia coli from Growing Piglets Receiving Antimicrobial Feed Additives.


Kim, L. M.; Gray, Jeffery T.; Harmon, Barry G.; Jones, Richard D.; Fedorka-Cray, Paula J. (United States of America)

Foodborne Pathogens and Disease (2005)

Reference


Three replicate trials were conducted using different sows. Each trial was composed of two groups (up to 45 piglets per group). Piglets in the control group were fed antimicrobial-free diets. In the treatment group, piglets received three different antimicrobial feed additives during the growth period. Sowsreceived antimicrobial-free diets starting at 100 days of age, and gestation and lactationdiets were antimicrobial-free. Piglet diets wereidentical in formulation and physical form/processing except for the addition of AFAs for the treatment group.

Sows and piglets were sampled at regular intervals for fecal E. coli, and recovery of 12 E.coli isolates per animal was attempted at each sampling.

AST Method: Broth Microdilution

Reference explicitly reports AST breakpoints: True

Reference reports using a MIC table: False

Is Excluded: False

Country Sub-Region Sub-Region Detail
United States of America Georgia (State) Athens
ID Note Resolution

Factors


Title Host Host Production Stage Description ROs
Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use Swine Piglets Farm All used as feed additives. Apramaycin sulfate: 150 g/ton as Apralan 7; 5 lb/pig at weaning. Carbadox: 50 g/ton as Mecadox 2.5; about 15 lb/pig. Chlortetracycline hydroxchloride: 250 g/ton; 14 days ad libitum. 3